<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mail on Sunday accuses BBC of paying for Google rankings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stuckon.co.uk/mail-on-sunday-accuses-bbc-of-paying-for-google-rankings-848.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stuckon.co.uk/mail-on-sunday-accuses-bbc-of-paying-for-google-rankings-848.html</link>
	<description>Internet marketing services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 08:26:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SirBigWig</title>
		<link>http://www.stuckon.co.uk/mail-on-sunday-accuses-bbc-of-paying-for-google-rankings-848.html/comment-page-1#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>SirBigWig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stuckon.co.uk/?p=848#comment-162</guid>
		<description>You really must ask yourself what a bunch of Luddites the Mail on Sunday must be. Surely they understand digital marketing, SEO, PPC as they are a major publisher.

Although they are not technically wrong in what they say the inference is that somehow the BBC have &quot;artificially&quot; paid to be on top. 

However, why the BBC need to pay for more more traffic to their site (using public money) is beyond me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You really must ask yourself what a bunch of Luddites the Mail on Sunday must be. Surely they understand digital marketing, SEO, PPC as they are a major publisher.</p>
<p>Although they are not technically wrong in what they say the inference is that somehow the BBC have &#8220;artificially&#8221; paid to be on top. </p>
<p>However, why the BBC need to pay for more more traffic to their site (using public money) is beyond me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
